Free tool · Website AI Readability Check

Website AI Readability Check:Is your homepage markup complete?

免费检查首页九项公开信号:身份声明、内容标记与机器读取通道。

免登录约 30 seconds只读公开网页

Checks Based on Schema.org, robots.txt and the llms.txt Proposal

AI readability: check machine-readable brand, product and language signals. This is a basic checklist, not a search ranking or real AI comprehension test.

Traditional SEO focuses on discovery and ranking in search results. GEO Audit focuses on what AI answers and which sources it uses. Some foundational signals overlap; only the homepage tool collects actual AI answers. The other three inspect static signals, not real recommendations.

  1. 01Enter a public website; no account or site administration access is needed.
  2. 02Run the check to read the homepage, llms.txt and robots.txt.
  3. 03Review detected and missing signals, then verify applicability on the site.
Method, references & output

Output: This page shows nine checks, evidence snippets and a score. Contact the advisor below the results if needed. No report-file export is available here.

Method: Rule-based detection in raw HTML and public files. Each check is equally weighted: passed / 9 × 100, rounded. This is our checklist score, not an AI comprehension score; detected markup may still be invalid or unverified.

Limits: Only the fetched homepage is checked. Scripts are not run; backlinks and actual AI recommendations are not tested. Missing signals may exist elsewhere. llms.txt is a community proposal, not a universal requirement.

Only public URLs are fetched. Pasted text/source is processed locally, not sent to AI. Do not submit private information. Service limits and access checks apply; no claim of absolute security is made.

Theory behind each check

GEO Audit Sentinel splits each theory behind this tool into three layers: verified (with a source), our inference, and gaps marked [FILL]. The tool only reads static page signals, so none of this promises rankings or more AI citations.

Source rights · identity declaration · Directly detectable

Machine-readable tags saying who you are and what you offer make the subject easier for machines to tell apart.

GEO Audit Sentinel checks: Structured data, organisation declaration, sameAs links, product/service entity

Verified: Schema.org publicly defines vocabulary such as Organization, Product and FAQPage. [7][19]

Our inference: Clearly declared entities are less likely to be confused with others. No public evidence shows a specific AI product reads these tags.

[FILL] Whether each AI platform reads page markup: to be verified against official statements.

Source rights · machine access · Directly detectable

Not blocking crawlers by mistake, and offering a site guide, gives your information a chance to be read.

GEO Audit Sentinel checks: robots.txt, llms.txt, language attribute (lang)

Verified: robots.txt is an IETF-standardised crawler protocol (RFC 9309); llms.txt is only a community proposal, not a universal standard. [5][20]

Our inference: Blocking crawlers by mistake reduces the chance of being read, but crawler names and compliance differ by platform.

[FILL] The tool only checks that the files exist; it does not analyse robots.txt rules per AI crawler.

Source rights · official pages state facts · Indirect cue only

Clear title, description and Q&A structure make a page easier to summarise accurately.

GEO Audit Sentinel checks: Title and description, Q&A structure (FAQPage)

Verified: Google Search documentation promotes helpful, reliable, people-first content (E-E-A-T reference). [6]

Our inference: That guidance targets search; applying it to AI answers is our inference. The tool checks tag presence, not whether content is true.

[FILL] Whether authority pages (about, credentials, contact) exist: not checked here; see the full audit.

Source rights · cross-site consistency · Not detectable yet

Keeping names and specifications consistent across your site, shops and encyclopedias reduces contradictions.

GEO Audit Sentinel checks: The tool reads only one homepage and cannot compare other sites

Verified: [FILL] No verified public study directly supports this yet.

Our inference: A methodological judgement: contradictory sources make wrong answers more likely. Verify with the same question set before and after.

[FILL] Cross-site consistency needs multi-source collection and is outside the free tools.

只读取公开网页、遵循 robots.txt、不保存本页体检结果。GEO 审计不承诺 AI 排名、引用或转化,只做信源确权与排除截流。